Intentional Acts and Unintentional Results
August 18, 2011
I am handling a homeowners liability claim under the HO5 policy. Our insured was conducting a controlled burn on his property. Winds picked up during the burn and caught his neighbor's lawn on fire and damaged trees on the neighbor's property. The expected or intended exclusion states that even if the damage is of a different kind, quality, or degree than initially expected, it is still considered intended. Would this apply to the neighbor's damaged property as well because our insured expected or intended to burn his property but not his neighbor's?
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]