Loaned Vehicle Policy Provides Primary Coverage for Auto Accident

This case is an insurance coverage dispute arising out of an auto accident in which the driver was operating a temporary substitute vehicle provided by a car dealership. Because both the policy insuring the driver and the policy insuring the dealership and its autos purport to transfer liability to the other insurance policy, the question the court had to answer was which policy provided primary coverage. This case is Beckman v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company, 2010 WL 3655916 (Neb.App.).

 

This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis