Prior Knowledge Exclusions in Excess Policies Bar Coverage of Legal Malpractice Claims

 

In Executive Risk Indem. Inc. v. Pepper Hamilton LLP, 2009 WL 3347222 (N.Y.), the Court of Appeals of New York was asked to determine, under Pennsylvania law, whether excess insurers Executive Risk Indemnity Inc. and Twin City Fire Insurance Company, based upon their prior knowledge exclusions, and Continental Casualty Company, based upon rescission of its policies, were entitled to summary judgment declaring that they had no obligation to indemnify defendants Pepper Hamilton LLP and one of its members, W. Roderick Gagné, in actions asserted against them for, among other claims, professional malpractice.

This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis