We have been asked to adjust a homeowners claim resulting from an ice storm that hit our state last winter. Ice formed on trees in the yard with the result that two branches broke off. One fell on a fence and one on a swing set. The swing set is the metal kind that may easily be set up in a yard. The insurer is of the opinion that neither loss is covered, citing the following exclusion of coverage for the fence, "weight of ice …to a fence," and citing the coverage provision for "weight of ice which … causes damage to property contained in a building." The insurer says that the swing set wasn't in a building, and so it is not covered.
We hold that the peril of "falling objects" applies to both losses. May we have your opinion?
Virginia Subscriber
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]