Prior to the original trial, Doucet and Gayden stipulated to a “high/low” agreement under which Doucet would receive no less than $50,000, and no more than $150,000. It was agreed that no appeal on that judgment would be taken. At that time, Doucet agreed that she no longer had a UM claim against State Farm.
State Farm continued to pursue a cross-claim for subrogation. The parties stipulated that whatever award was made in light of the high/low agreement, that award would be subject to State Farm's claim. Doucet agreed on the record that it was unnecessary for State Farm to participate further in the trial and that the absence of the insurer's counsel would not be used as grounds for an argument of failure to defend.
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]