Over time, rain leaked through cracks in the mortar in a masonry wall (undetected) until rotting floor joists and sagging floor revealed the loss. The wear and tear clause included in the maintenance type losses exclusion includes "hidden decay." However, collapse coverage includes "hidden decay." Which wins?

Tennessee Subscriber

You raise a very interesting question in the matter of a seeming conflict between the "maintenance type loss" exclusion in the Businessowners special form and the coverage agreement respecting collapse in the same form. The one says that there is no coverage for loss "caused by or resulting from decay" and the other says "we will pay for loss or damage caused by or resulting from collapse of a building or any part of a building caused by hidden decay."

This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis