Usual Exertion Doctrine?

Q

I was reading about something called the “usual exertion” principle in a workers compensation case that was before the Delaware Supreme Court a while ago. The case dealt with a roofer who injured his back while unloading a bundle of roof shingles. The roofer's petition for workers compensation benefits was denied by the Industrial Accident Board due to a finding that he had a preexisting, congenital back problem; upon appeal, the Supreme Court decided the roofer was entitled to compensation based on the usual exertion principle.

This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis