According to the majority, there was a "causal relationship" between the incident and the employment of the insured vehicle "as a vehicle" because Estep was not using the vehicle "in a manner foreign to its design purpose." (Credit: frankieleon/ Wikimedia Commons)
A majority of the Virginia Court of Appeals sided with an auto insurance policyholder Tuesday, upholding a circuit court order awarding him $30,000 for medical benefits for injuries he sustained while packing his vehicle in a hotel parking lot.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
- Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
- Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Allison Dunn
Allison Dunn is a reporter on ALM's Rapid Response desk based in Ohio, covering impactful litigation filings and rulings, emerging legal trends, controversies in the industry, and everything in between. Contact her at [email protected]. On Twitter: @AllisonDWrites.
