The following is a continuation from aprevious article in which we introduced the mechanics of aclaims audit, as well as the benefits that can be derivedfrom the results of an audit. The most obvious positive benefitsarising out of claims auditing are the identification of:

  • Strong claims handling activities and strategies that should beretained and built upon.
  • Areas where claims handling are not as efficient or effectiveas they should be and that should be strengthened to reach a“leading industry practices” standard.

This identification process allows the insurer, third partyadministrator (TPA), independent adjuster (IA) or other entity totake steps to improve the overall claims program. The outcomeof the improved claims programs should be reaching claimresolutions promptly, providing the policyholders with a level ofservice that meets or exceeds their expectations, and controllingclaims costs and expenses to the extent possible.

|

Property Claims Are Different

|

The primary focus here is on auditing property claims, whichrequire significantly different claims handling than the workers' compensation claims that we covered last month.Effective property claims management requires more of a claimsprocessing effort, as opposed to claimsmanagement that we emphasized in handling workers'compensation claims.

|

There are a variety of ways in which to handle property claims.An insurer may use in-house adjusters, or may use the services ofTPAs or IAs to perform some or all of the tasks associated withhandling the claim, including preparation of the repair/replacementestimates. The insurer, TPA, or IA may also use numerousexternal vendors, and the services of these vendors must be wellcoordinated during the relatively brief life of a property claim toachieve the optimal outcome.

|

Property claims require fewer touches, and inmany cases can be resolved relatively quickly, at least as far asthe claims management work is concerned. Property claims, exceptfor the periodic large loss or catastrophic claim, should behandled, paid, and closed within a 30-day period, except for thepossible need to reopen the claims later to pay replacement costvalues. Property claims are generally categorized more as“short-tail” claims, and create fewer reserving issues.

|

Property losses, however, depending upon the type of loss andthe time required to get the property back to pre-loss status, canalso cause significant hardships for one or more persons.Homeowners' property losses disrupt a person's or family's lives,and can also cause financial hardships. Commercial losses leadnot only to the need to re-build and re-stock over a period oftime, but can also lead to financial loss for the policyholder andits employees if the business is interrupted for lengthy periods. Acommercial loss may also have a negative impact on other companiesthat rely upon the company that sustained the loss as one of thelinks in its supply chain, or as a key customer. Therefore, it iscritical to efficiently and promptly manage the claims to mitigatethe losses to the greatest extentpossible.

|

Added Benefits of Claims Audits: ThreePerspectives

|

Property claims management enhancements which are developedfollowing objective claims audits can provide benefits to threedifferent major parties—the policyholders, the insurer, and the TPAor IA. Several benefits apply to all three parties:

  1. Improved communication/reduced conflict in resolving theclaim.
  2. More accurate payments.
  3. Early resolution, thus allowing rebuilding to beginpromptly.

There are other benefits, however, that are specific to eachparty. For example, consider the items below.

|

Major Parties

The Benefits

Policyholder

|
  • Prompt payment to repair or replace damaged/lostproperty to get life back to normal as quickly aspossible.
  • Reduced negative impact on quality oflife.
  • Reduced negative financial impact on a business,its owners, and its employees.

Insurer

|
  • Reduced claims costs and expenses.
  • Improved use of vendors, thus providing greaterexpense control.
  • Satisfied/pleased customers, which should lead tohigher customer retention and recommendations to othercustomers.

TPA and/or IA

|
  • An improved relationship with the insurer orultimate customer, potentially leading to more business fromthat customer and recommendations to other potentialcustomers.
  • Improved cash flow if payment for its services isbased on prompt completion of the required tasks—forexample, field inspection and appraisal presentation.

|

What An Audit Reveals

|

In last month's article we emphasized that workers' compensationclaims require more claims management rather than justclaims processing. Effective management of property claims,on the other hand, should be focused more on efficientprocessing of the claim. Leading industry practicesor “Best Practices” in property claims management place criticalimportant on timely and coordinated activities and actions thatallow the policyholder to recover from the losses as quickly aspossible. A claims audit can help to identify where there areimpediments to efficient processing and resolution.

|

Reviewing Claims Activities

|

The claims audit should measure the performance of the insurer,TPA, or IA against leading industry practices while also evaluatingthe efficiency of the processes. A property review should includebut may not be limited to, the following characteristics. There arenumerous criteria under each major topic that should be consideredwhile evaluating that component. Refer to theexamples listed on the next page.

|

Topic

Characteristics

Documentation

|
  • Did the adjuster and supervisor document their actions aswell as those of its vendors so anyone reading the file couldunderstand the status and plans?

Intake

|
  • Did the policyholder and/or agent promptly report theloss?

Set-up and assignment

|
  • Was the file promptly set up and assigned to the adjuster withthe appropriate level of experience and expertise?

Coverage analysis and confirmation

|
  • Was the coverage properly applied to the loss? Theanalysis of commercial coverage is especially challenging, andmay require the review by more experienced or more seniorclaims personnel.
  • Were the appropriate endorsements, exclusions,limits/sublimits, and so forth, evaluated?

Contact (initial and ongoing)

|
  • Was prompt and meaningful contact made with thepolicyholder within one workday of claim receipt and was contactmaintained throughout the life of the claim?
  • Did the adjuster keep the policyholder informed of his/herrole in the claim, and are they informed of the plans andtimelines?

Investigation

|
  • Was the investigation initiated at the time of initialcontact, and did it include a thorough investigation andconsideration of other avenues to investigate (e.g., potentialrecoveries)?
  • Was the loss as the result of a covered peril?
  • Does the loss as described by the policyholder fall underthe coverage?
  • Were ancillary services used when needed (e.g., aerialphotographs, drawings, and measurements; damage mitigationservices) to augment the investigation/scoping?

Field inspection

|
  • Was field inspection required for this type or severity ofloss? If so, then was the field inspection scheduledpromptly, and was the extent of damages adequatelyscoped?
  • Were photographs taken to document and memorialize theextent of damage?
  • Was the information gathered at the site inspectionconsistent with what had been reported and that had beencompared to the coverage provided?
  • Were reports obtained from fire and/or police departmentsas needed?

Damages documentation/ estimates

|
  • Was the repair or replacement estimate prepared whileon-site?
  • Were updated price lists used for labor andmaterials?
  • Were supplemental estimates reviewed forreasonableness?
  • Were replacement cost (RC) and actual cash value (ACV)estimates prepared as required based on thecoverage provided?
  • Did the adjuster identify issues that must be addressed bya more experienced adjuster or by a specialist (e.g.,structural engineer, cause and origin specialist)?

Reserving

|
  • Was the reserving process and estimate reasonable, and didthe case reserves reflect the estimated ultimate value?

Potential recoveries

|
  • Were potential recovery opportunities identified andpursued (e.g., subrogation, apportionment through tendering toother parties, reinsurance)?
  • Was the site preserved for additional inspection orevaluation if that was needed?
  • Were the appropriate experts used to evaluate the loss(e.g., cause and origin specialists, engineers)?

Fraud investigation and/or referral to SIU

|
  • Were red flags identified during the investigation thatled to the need for more investigation and/or for referral tothe special investigation unit (SIU)?
  • Were civil authorities consulted if a questionableloss?
  • Was a reservation of rights letter promptly sent to thepolicyholder?

Payment calculations

|
  • Was the appraisal/repair estimate accurately completed,recognizing that hidden damage may require supplementalestimates?
  • Were the appropriate limits, sublimits, and deductiblesapplied to the payment? Were payments based on RC or ACV asrequired by the policy?
  • Was the repair completion confirmed before issuingreplacement cost payments?

Negotiation / Settlement

|
  • Was the repair or replacement estimate written so that allparties could confirm the costs required to place thepolicyholder back to pre-loss status (or replacement cost if allowed by the policy)?
  • Were specialty firms used when appropriate to provideobjective and consistent RC/ACV when required (e.g., like kindand quality (LKQ), services, contents valuation firms)?

Planning / Resolution

|
  • Was the claim actively moved toward resolution at all times,based on documentation in the claims file?

For property claims, it is critical to ensurethat the claim is handled as expeditiously as possible, thataccurate repair and/or replacement appraisals are prepared, thatthe policyholder is kept aware of the claim's status, and that theresolution is reached promptly so that the policyholder can get therepairs underway and completed as promptly as possible.

|

Expected Claims Audit Output

|

The audit report should provide information suchas:

  • Observations regarding the timing and completeness of keyclaims activities, and any redundancies, unnecessary hand-offs, orother inefficiencies that slow the resolution of the claim
  • Objective measurements when possible. This may extend tointervals between specific steps and activities that were or shouldhave been taken, such as the interval between the date of firstcontact and the date of field inspection, the interval between thefield inspection and completion of the appraisal.
  • Examples and data to clearly illustrate and support thefindings
  • Specific recommendations in any area where claims managementperformance did not meet “leading industry practices” and were notefficient.

The recommendations that the claims auditor provides should besupportable, and the auditor should provide specificrecommendations to retain strong claims-handling activities andimprove those that are suboptimal. It is through this objectivedocumentation of findings and recommendations that the insurer,TPA, or IA can achieve a greater performance level.

|

Property claims audits should be viewed as part of the processrequired for insurers, TPAs, and IAs to strengthen their programs.The goal is to reach prompt resolution of the claims whileproviding the policyholders with excellent service. This meansminimizing the number of surprises and disagreements. Policyholdersmay then continue with rebuilding their properties and returningtheir lives to pre-loss status as quickly aspossible.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

  • All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
  • Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
  • Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.