Fraud of the Week: Banned by the Department
The California Department of Insurance discovers a company sending misleading and false mailers to consumers and makes the company stop.
Read Full ArticleThe California Department of Insurance discovers a company sending misleading and false mailers to consumers and makes the company stop.
Read Full ArticleThe Supreme Court of Connecticut ruled that an insurer had a duty to defend a dog bite case in Hartford Casualty Ins. Co. v. Litchfield Mut. Fire Ins.…
Read Full ArticleHO 04 30 03 22 Theft Coverage Increase homeowners endorsement.
Read Full ArticleLifting of Shingles Causes Damage September 25, 2013 Citizens Homeowner 3 special form HO-3 01 13 section 1-perils insured against, 2, h. WE DO NOT…
Read Full ArticleDamage to Property Exclusionand Carpet Cleaning Q Our insured, a carpet-cleaning company, carries a standard ISO CGL policy (1998 edition). An employee…
Read Full ArticleThis case discusses how and when business interruption coverage is triggered under a BOP policy.
Read Full ArticleIn State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. Coe, No. 1-05-1891, 2006 WL 2547329 (Ill. App. Dist. 1 Sept. 5, 2006), an Illinois appeals court ruled that the…
Read Full ArticleAn overview of the FP 05 22 06 25 Cab Glass Breakage endorsement.
Read Full ArticleA federal district court in Georgia has ruled that two insurance companies were not entitled to recover post-judgment interest in a contribution action…
Read Full ArticleCP 19 10 10 91 Your Business Personal Property - Separation Of Coverage, October 1991 Edition
Read Full Article