In Pennsylvania an unofficial litmus test is emerging, requiring counsel to have at least an indication that content on a social networking site will contradict a litigant's testimony or claims, before the court will grant access to "private" information on such sites.
DebugScreen: mobile
{
"author": {
"name": "Kevin M Blake Esq",
"webUrl": "/author/profile/kevin-m-blake-esq/",
"description": "",
"imageLarge": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/f16d6fc2845f417ea0e93a3f2b6cd37d?s=136&d=mm&r=g",
"estimate": 1,
"social": [],
"articles": [
{
"uri": "/2012/01/27/the-big-reveal-of-private-social-media-data/",
"title": "The Big Reveal of ‘Private’ Social Media Data",
"byline": "Kevin M. Blake, Esq.",
"kicker": "",
"prettyDate": "January 27, 2012",
"timeToRead": "9 minute",
"image": {
"uri": "",
"width": "",
"height": ""
},
"authors": [
{
"webUrl": "/author/profile/kevin-m-blake-esq/",
"name": "Kevin M. Blake, Esq."
}
],
"kickerNode": [],
"summary": "In Pennsylvania an unofficial litmus test is emerging, requiring counsel to have at least an indication that content on a social networking site will contradict a litigant's testimony or claims, before the court will grant access to "private" information on such sites.",
"body": null
}
]
}
}