{
  "author": {
    "name": "Kathryn C Ashton",
    "webUrl": "/author/profile/kathryn-c-ashton/",
    "description": "",
    "imageLarge": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/f16d6fc2845f417ea0e93a3f2b6cd37d?s=136&d=mm&r=g",
    "estimate": 1,
    "social": [],
    "articles": [
      {
        "uri": "/2015/04/02/do-choice-of-law-provisions-insulate-insurance-carriers-from-tort-and-punitive-damage-liability-under-california-law/",
        "title": "Do choice-of-law provisions insulate insurance carriers from tort and punitive damage liability under California law?",
        "byline": "Kathryn C. Ashton",
        "kicker": "News",
        "prettyDate": "April 02, 2015",
        "timeToRead": "12 minute",
        "image": {
          "uri": "",
          "width": "",
          "height": ""
        },
        "authors": [
          {
            "webUrl": "/author/profile/kathryn-c-ashton/",
            "name": "Kathryn C. Ashton"
          }
        ],
        "kickerNode": [
          {
            "uri": "/news/",
            "sectionName": "News"
          }
        ],
        "summary": "Its no secret that California permits policyholders to assert either contract or tort remedies for an insurers breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Here's what that means for carriers.",
        "body": null
      }
    ]
  }
}