{
  "author": {
    "name": "Cesar A Pereira",
    "webUrl": "/author/profile/cesar-a-pereira/",
    "description": "",
    "imageLarge": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/f16d6fc2845f417ea0e93a3f2b6cd37d?s=136&d=mm&r=g",
    "estimate": 1,
    "social": [],
    "articles": [
      {
        "uri": "/2019/01/30/additional-insured-coverage-asked-answered-and-unanswered-414-146930/",
        "title": "Additional insured coverage: asked, answered and unanswered",
        "byline": "Cesar A. Pereira and Julian D. Ehrlich",
        "kicker": "Market Insights",
        "prettyDate": "January 30, 2019",
        "timeToRead": "11 minute",
        "image": {
          "uri": "https://images.propertycasualty360.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/414/2019/01/Construction616-injury-2.jpg",
          "width": "616",
          "height": "372"
        },
        "authors": [
          {
            "webUrl": "/author/profile/cesar-a-pereira/",
            "name": "Cesar A. Pereira"
          },
          {
            "webUrl": "/author/profile/julian-d-ehrlich/",
            "name": "Julian D. Ehrlich"
          }
        ],
        "kickerNode": [
          {
            "uri": "/market-insights/",
            "sectionName": "Market Insights"
          }
        ],
        "summary": "Appellate court decisions are finding additional insured denials are improper and providing guidance on the new standard.",
        "body": null
      }
    ]
  }
}