Mercer County Superior Court Judge R. Brian McLaughlin said: "This is not a dog-bite case despite the fact that a dog bite is part of the subject matter of this litigation." Credit: Gabriel Cassan/Adobe Stock
The doctrine of parental immunity doesn't protect a dog owner from sharing liability for a vicious attack on his own child, a New Jersey appeals court ruled.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
- Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
- Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Charles Toutant
Charles Toutant is a litigation writer for the New Jersey Law Journal.
