Attorneys for plaintiff Lynda Boccella claim the insurer should be on the hook for the full award since they declined to offer the defendant's $300,000 policy limit to resolve the dispute. (Credit: Beate Wolter/Shutterstock.com) Attorneys for plaintiff Lynda Boccella claim the insurer should be on the hook for the full award since they declined to offer the defendant's $300,000 policy limit to resolve the dispute. (Credit: Beate Wolter/Shutterstock.com)

Fresh off of winning a $3 million verdict Thursday, the plaintiff in a dog bite suit alleged the defendant's insurer acted in bad faith.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

  • All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
  • Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
  • Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Aleeza Furman

Aleeza Furman is a Philadelphia-based litigation reporter with The Legal Intelligencer. Contact her at [email protected].

Litigation
Personal Lines
Property & Casualty