Hanover did not dispute that Fishbowl had been the victim of a data breach. However, it claimed that the client had been negligent, which was a break in the chain of causation between the data breach and the loss. (Credit: Shutterstock)
The federal district court for the District of Minnesota recently granted summary judgment in favor of Fishbowl Solutions, Inc. against Hanover Insurance Company for coverage of two fraudulent invoice payments. The case is called Fishbowl Sols., Inc. v. Hanover Ins. Co., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200210 (D. Minn. 2022).
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
- Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
- Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
