The court's decision in Jones v. Erie Insurance Exchange allowed the plaintiffs' underinsured motorist insurance claim to proceed despite a provision in their insurance policy barring coverage for vehicles the policyholder regularly uses but does not own. (Photo: Piyawat Nandeenopparit/Shutterstock.)
For the second time in the last year, the state Superior Court determined an auto insurance policy's "regular use" exclusion violates Pennsylvania's Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
- Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
- Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Aleeza Furman
Aleeza Furman is a Philadelphia-based litigation reporter with The Legal Intelligencer. Contact her at [email protected].
