Illinois Casualty moved for summary judgment, arguing that the insurer did not owe the Parks defendants "any duty to defend or duty to indemnify with respect to the underlying lawsuit" under the liquor liability policy issued to Little Daddy's and the businessowners policies for both clubs. (Credit: Maren Winter/Shutterstock.com)
A liquor liability exclusion precluded any duty for an insurer to defend a suit in which an injured motorist claimed a bar had negligently allowed a customer to become inebriated, the Indiana Supreme Court decided. The case is Ebert v. Illinois Cas. Co., No. 22S-PL-8 (Ill. June 16, 2022).
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
- Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
- Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
