The decision reaffirms Illinois law stating that insurance policies and provisions that are unambiguous and do not violate public policy are to be enforced as written.
(Credit: ImagineGolf/iStockphoto.com)
The Illinois Supreme Court ruled that a policy's mechanical device exclusion at the center of a lawsuit was not ambiguous, correcting an insurance policy interpretation error by the Illinois Appellate Court, Fifth District.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
- Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
- Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
