Manual reconciliation of vast amounts of data is an arduousprocess, involving countless staff hours that includesbacktracking, often ending without an audit trail to demonstratehow the balance sheet was derived.

|

Automated processes offer a solution to this risk-ladenadventure. However, not all automated reconciliation solutions arethe same. To effectively reduce the risk of non-compliance andprovide a cost savings, the reconciliation solution should be adata-agnostic tool, capable of pulling massive amounts of disparatedata around various claims, equity fund balances, payments,disbursements, etc.

|

The recent white paper, “The Buried Costs and Hidden Risksof Manual Reconciliation for Insurers,” illustrates howto calculate and compare the costs of a manual system versus anautomated system. Readers also will discover how one major bankreduced processing errors from $108 million to less than $20,000 insix years.

|

Click here to request your copy.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

  • All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
  • Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
  • Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.