Insurance agents and brokers are in the business of transacting insurance with insurers on behalf of their clients. Unless they take on a fiduciary responsibility, they're only expected to obtain the insurance requested by the prospect. But after a loss, insureds who incur a loss greater than the limits purchased may try to recover the losses from the agent, who they claim should have forced them to buy more insurance.

On Aug. 28, 2013, Gale and Douglas Hernandez sued State Farm General Insurance Co., Dale Adams (individually and as a State Farm agent), Allstate Insurance Co. and Frank Capella (individually and as an Allstate agent). The plaintiffs claimed that Allstate negligently miscalculated the damage to their home caused by Hurricane Isaac and failed to pay amounts owed under the policy. The plaintiffs allege that they were not paid any amounts by State Farm under the homeowners' policy.

The amended complaint alleged that Capella and Adams were negligent in procuring policies in not properly valuing the plaintiffs' property and failing to properly advise plaintiffs on the correct coverage limits to fully cover their home. They also alleged that Capella and Adams were negligent in procuring insurance, the limits of which could never be obtained given the property insured.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

  • All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
  • Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
  • Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.