Attorneys representing insurers who lost their argument to a jury that destruction of the World Trade Center by terrorists was one covered event, not two, are hoping an appeals court will throw out the panel's verdict for lack of evidence.
Last week the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York heard legal arguments from eight insurers contending they should not be responsible for paying Silverstein Properties for two occurrences related to the 9/11 terror attack.
Lawyers for Silverstein Properties, holders of the lease on the twin towers, argued against the appeal saying the insurers' case lacks merit.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
- Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
- Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
