NU Online News Service, May 9, 3:40 p.m.EDT--California Assemblyman Mark Ridley-Thomas, D-LosAngeles, has withdrawn his bill mandating insurance industrycommunity redevelopment investments from consideration thisyear.

|

Vincent Harris, chief of staff to Mr. Ridley-Thomas, said thebill was withdrawn to allow the California Department of Insuranceto conduct a data call of state licensed insurers regarding theirinvestment practices.

|

"Many of the insurers claim they already invest in the state andthat the one percent would be a burden," Mr. Harris said. "And theadvocates claim the figure is way too low."

|

Mr. Harris said the results of the data call should be availablewithin the next few weeks and based on that information a decisionwill be made whether or not to revise the bill, or drop italtogether next year.

|

Meanwhile, the life and property-casualty insurance sector areproviding stiff opposition to the bill.

|

Christian John Rataj, state affairs manager for the NationalAssociation of Mutual Insurance Companies, said AB 925 is "flawed"from a public policy standpoint.

|

"The bill is unnecessary since the insurance industry alreadyinvests a significant amount of money toward urban development andother areas of the state throughout California," he said.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

  • All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
  • Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
  • Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.