Agents, Brokers May Sue Over ?Do Not Call' Regs
|By Steven Brostoff, Washington Editor
|NU Online News Service, Aug. 6, 11:35 a.m. EDT,Washington?The Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers ofAmerica may go to court to try and overturn new FederalCommunications Commission regulations subjecting the insuranceindustry to "do not call" telemarketing requirements.
|"We are fully prepared to file a lawsuit if necessary," saidMaria Berthoud, senior vice president of federal affairs for theAlexandria, Va.-based IIABA.
|Currently, she said, IIABA is looking at the possibility of alegislative solution. Agents are forming a coalition with realtorsand other professionals who are affected by the FCC's "do not call"regulation, Ms. Berthoud said.
|In addition, she said, IIABA is launching a grassroots effort,asking agents to contact their members of Congress to express theiropposition to the regulation.
|Ms. Berthoud noted that in addition to a requirement that agentsand others affected by the new regulation check a "do not call"list before contacting a prospect with whom there is no priorbusiness relationship, the FCC also establishes a "do not fax"requirement.
|The "do not fax" provision, she said, is at least as importantto agents as the "do not call" provision.
|The FCC's "do not call" regulation was issued on July 25, 2003,and applies to those industries, including insurance, that areexempt from a similar "do not call" regulation promulgated earlierthis year by the Federal Trade Commission.
|But the FCC's regulation goes beyond that of the FTC, in that itapplies to all calls, both local and interstate. The FTC'sregulation applies only to interstate calls.
|In addition, the FCC declined to include a "de minimis"exemption for small businesses that make a limited number ofcalls.
|FCC said in the regulation that it does not believe the costs ofchecking a national database will be unreasonable for a smallbusiness.
|As for the insurance industry specifically, the FCC rejectedformal comments filed by the Washington-based American Council ofLife Insurers arguing that because the business of insurance isregulated by the states under the McCarran-Ferguson Act theregulation should not apply to the insurance industry.
|FCC said the McCarran-Ferguson Act does not operate to exemptinsurance companies wholesale from the "do not call"requirement.
|Indeed, FCC said, the legislation that established the "do notcall" requirement, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, iscompatible with state regulatory interests.
|Moreover, FCC said, uniform application of a national "do notcall" registry best serves the goals of the legislation.
|"To exempt the insurance industry from liability under TCPAwould likely confuse consumers and interfere with the protectionsprovided by Congress through the TCPA," FCC said.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
- Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
- Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.