Recently, the Eastern District of New York granted summary judgment to an insurer, holding that the insurer had no duty to defend based on the terms of an exclusion in the policy. This decision highlights how, where the facts plainly fall within a clearly-drafted exclusion, courts will not hesitate to enforce the exclusion as written.
Read Full ArticleAutomatic Coverage For Additional or Replacement Vehicles September 9, 2013 Summary: The policy provisions of the personal auto…
Read Full ArticleWhen an insured takes a vehicle off the policy, how long does she have to add a new vehicle for it to be considered a replacement vehicle?
Read Full ArticleHealth Clubs and Gyms ISO Market Segments ProgramJuly 1, 2016Summary: The Insurance Services Office (ISO) has developed a market segments…
Read Full ArticleThe ISO BP 04 06 08 24 Additional Insured - Controlling Interest endorsement that attaches to the BOP policy.
Read Full ArticleCG 22 93 07 98 Lawn Care Services Coverage, July 1998 Edition
Read Full ArticleSigns Temporarily Unattached Excluded under Commercial Property Form Our insured had some signs that were permanently attached to the exterior walls…
Read Full ArticleRegulations issued by the New York State Department of Financial Services ("DFS") that would severely alter the current practices of title…
Read Full ArticleExclusive Remedy Provision August 8, 2016 Kershner appeals a trial court summary judgment on his premises liability claim against Samsung Austin…
Read Full ArticleEmployers Mutual Companies Umbrella Policy Form CU 7300 and Endorsements, August 1986 Edition
Read Full Article