Filed Under:Markets, Personal Lines

Judge Hears Arguments, but Again Dismisses Suit Seeking Block of Fla. PIP Law

A Florida district-court judge again denied an injunction that would halt implementation of Florida’s personal injury protection reform law signed in May last year. 

Judge Richard Lazzara, in the United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, in Tampa, issued the order after a group of chiropractors, massage therapists and acupuncturists asked him to reconsider an earlier order he issued on Dec. 12, 2012 denying the group’s motion.

Lazzara called the plaintiffs’ motion “passionate,” but said that “no matter to what degree this court may sympathize with Plaintiffs’ plight of suffering potential economic loss by virtue of this newly enacted legislation, the court must be guided by the rule of law....”

To that end, Lazzara says the plaintiffs’ contention is “that they possess a fundamental property right in their professional licenses to practice chiropractic medicine, acupuncture medicine, and massage therapy by virtue of their licensure by the State of Florida to practice those healing arts.” Therefore, according to Lazzara, plaintiffs argue that “amendments to the PIP Act which constrain, in the case of a chiropractic physician, and eliminate, in the case of an acupuncture physician and a massage therapist, their ability to seek reimbursement for professional services rendered to a person injured in a motor vehicle collision under the personal injury protection provisions of an automobile insurance policy deny them due process of law and the equal protection of the laws under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.”

But he adds, “What Plaintiffs fail to grasp is that although they do have a state-created property interest in their professional licenses, that interest is only subject to procedural due process protection and not substantive due process protection.”

Responding to the decision, R Street Florida Director Christian R. Cámara says, “[Florida Governor Rick] Scott and the Florida Legislature heard the calls from Florida consumers about their runaway auto-insurance costs and took action to cut out the fraud and unscrupulous claims that were driving up rates. The federal court did the right thing in upholding those cost-saving, pro-consumer reforms by throwing out this lawsuit. It is unfortunate that opponents of reform who couldn’t get their way in the Capitol last year insist on using the courts to legislate on their behalf.”

R Street notes that Lazzara’s decision allows the plaintiffs to proceed with a separate suit in Florida state court. That suit, says R Street, is Myers, et al vs. Kevin McCarty, and was filed Jan. 9 in Tallahassee in the Second Judicial Circuit Court for Leon County.

Featured Video

Most Recent Videos

Video Library ››

Top Story

Weekend of deadly storms and tornadoes slam the South [photos]

There were more than 200 reports of severe weather and more than two dozen reports of tornadoes this weekend as of early Sunday morning in an ongoing multi-day tornado and severe weather outbreak.

Top Story

Here are the top 10 states people are moving from

Knowing the states that people are moving out of can help insurance agents and brokers plan for the potential loss of clients who relocate to another state.

More Resources

Comments

eNewsletter Sign Up

PropertyCasualty360 Daily eNews

Get P&C insurance news to stay ahead of the competition in one concise format - FREE. Sign Up Now!

Mobile Phone

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.