Filed Under:Risk Management, Captives

Insurance Captives Finding Home Onshore

(Kike Calvo via AP Images)
(Kike Calvo via AP Images)

NU Online News Service,  Aug. 17, 2:25  p.m. EDT

The years of dominance enjoyed by off-shore captive domiciles may be coming to an end as more captive formations move onshore into the United States and Europe, says a report from the Insurance Information Institute.

In an update to its research of alternative risk vehicles on Thursday, I.I.I. says more than half of captive formations in 2011 were located within the European Union and the United States, increasing the total of onshore domiciles from 35 percent in 1991. 

But still only one of 2011’s top five captives were onshore, with Vermont’s 590 active captives coming in third to the 862 located in Bermuda and 707 located in Cayman. Guernsey, a captive domicile with 343 captives was fourth and Barbados, an off-shore domicile, rounded out the top five with 270 captives.

In Europe, Guernsey was the largest domicile with 343 captives in 2011. Luxembourg was second (242) followed by the Isle of Man (133), Dublin (101) and Sweden (49). 

In the United States, a number of states have passed laws permitting the formation of captives, with Oregon being the most recent to open to single-parent (set-up by an individual company), association and reinsurer captives since July. 

In June 2011, Tennessee passed legislation enabling captives to write workers’ compensation insurance policies and permitting protected-cell, branch and special-purpose finance operations.  The state hopes to boost its captive circulation since it dropped to four in 2010.

In July 2012, Connecticut licensed Thomson Reuters Risk Management, Inc., as its first captive insurance company. The risk management vehicle of Thomson Reuters had moved from its location in Delaware, but Connecticut’s jobs legislation revisions expanded the types of insurance transactions permitted by captives. 

Vermont is the largest U.S. captive domicile followed by Utah (239), Hawaii (172), South Carolina (159) and the District of Columbia (157).

A.M. Best said that in 2011, 209 U.S. captive insurance companies saw a net income decrease of 21 percent pertaining to underwriting income, net investment income and realized capital gains, casting some uncertainty on their financial health. The survey attributes this to a continuing soft market, low investment yields and a sleepy worldwide economy. However, single-parent captives outperformed the commercial market that year in profitability.

A regulatory issue of concern in Europe arises under Solvency II. The regulations could boost regulatory capital requirements for EU’s captives by up to 400 percent when it is implemented between 2013 and 2014. In the European Union, captives in one domicile are allowed to be admitted into another within the EU. However, under the proposed Solvency II rules, it is not yet evident if a captive owned by an EU business or associattion, but domiciled outside of the EU, will have regulatory equivalence.

Featured Video

Most Recent Videos

Video Library ››

Top Story

3 best practices for collaborating with InsurTech startups

No one said it would be easy to bring together legacy and nascent insurance companies, but the result could mean significant growth for both.

Top Story

3 ways to ease the business interruption claims process

The biggest challenge for companies managing business interruption (BI) claims: Accurately quantifying their losses.

More Resources


eNewsletter Sign Up

PropertyCasualty360 Daily eNews

Get P&C insurance news to stay ahead of the competition in one concise format - FREE. Sign Up Now!

Mobile Phone

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.