The Hartford Buying Back Securities Sold to Allianz During Financial Crisis

NU Online News Service, April 2, 1:25 p.m. EST

The Hartford Insurance Group says it is buying back, at a steep premium, securities it sold to Allianz during the height of the 2008-2009 financial crisis.

Despite the high cost, Stern Agee analyst John Nadel calls the decision positive because it improves the Hartford’s financial flexibility.

The Hartford says it has negotiated an agreement with Allianz to repurchase all outstanding 10 percent fixed-to-floating rate junior subordinated debentures due 2068 for $2.125 billion.

The principal amount of the notes was $1.75 billion. In addition, the company is using $300 million of remaining buyback authorization to repurchase all outstanding warrants issued to Allianz to purchase 69.4 million shares of its common stock at strike price of $25.23.

Nadel explains that, in the long run, the deal is cheap for the Hartford. “We estimate contractually this would have cost theHartfordabout $2.8 billion versus the $2.125 billon that was negotiated with Allianz,” Nadel says.

That is a savings of approximately $700 million, or 24 percent.

Nadel also says that the decision means that the Hartford management “continues to demonstrate a clear willingness to go beyond the status quo to deliver value for shareholders beyond that currently discounted in the share price.”

At the same time, Nadel says in an investor’s note that he expected the Hartford would announce various debt offerings aimed at raising $2.1 billion in new cash.

Nadel estimates the elimination of the 10 percent Allianz debt, partially offset by a higher principal amount of new debt at a substantially lower weighted average coupon, should save the Hartford between $50 and $75 million in annual pre-tax interest expense.

“Clearly, pricing of the new debt will be a key determinant, and we expect theHartfordwill announce multiple tranche and multiple maturities debt offerings this morning for marketing/pricing over the next couple of days,” Nadel says.

The decision to repurchase the Allianz interest at a premium is part of the decision by the Hartford to regroup and exit the life-variable-annuity business.

It did so under pressure from hedge-fund manager John Paulson.

Under the decision, announced March 21, the Hartford will concentrate on its property and casualty, group benefits and mutual funds businesses.

The Hartford originally entered into the costly deal with Allianz during the height of the economic downturn because it was caught with variable annuities that offered guarantees to investors.

Hartford's innovations, including guarantees, in the VA market forced other market players to follow, resulting in an increase in a VA market that had been in the doldrums since the Bush tax cuts that helped lift total VA sales to $180 billion in 2007.

However, as the stock market plunged and the economy sunk, the product began to take a heavy toll onHartford.

By late 2008, the Hartford was seeking outside investors, as well as funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program initiated by the Bush administration in the fall of 2008.

Its need to “de-risk” the business has resulted in a plunge in market share and investment in the business. From a top sales spot in the mid-2000s, Hartford finished 2010 in 20th place among leading variable-annuity sellers, and last year it didn't make the top 20 chart compiled by industry-funded research firm LIMRA.

The runoff of the annuity operation also affects its fixed and fixed-indexed annuities, a much smaller proportion of its book of business.

The company is placing its individual-annuity business into runoff “and is pursuing sales or other strategic alternatives for its individual life, Woodbury Financial Services and Retirement Plans.”

The company is stopping new annuity sales effective April 27 and expects to take a related after-tax charge of $15 million to $20 million in the second quarter of 2012.

This action is also expected to reduce annual run-rate operating expenses by approximately $100 million, pre-tax, beginning in 2013.


Resource Center

View All »

Contractors General Liability Coverage 102

What is a prior work exclusion? Which option is right for my client? Why do...

Sign up today to get a 50% matching credit -...

Insurance marketing sometimes seems like it's a game of swings and misses, but we're here...

Guide: 5 Steps to Selling Cyber

Cyber risk and data security is on the agenda of every business owner and executive....

Citation Correlation

Do rigger and signalperson qualifications correlate with the cause of crane and rigging accidents? ...

Complete Guide to Electronic Signatures in Property & Casualty Insurance...

In property and casualty insurance, closing new business quickly is key. Learn how to leverage...

INSTANT ACCESS: Complimentary Sales Closer Questionnaires

Help property owners or managers compare your commercial residential property insurance coverage vs. the competition....

Determining Vacant Property Perils and Valuations

Are your clients fully covered for Vacant Properties? In this economic climate, your insureds may...

Risk Management for Law Firms

This package of 3 concise risk management articles offers straightforward content and practical suggestions law...

Guide: Top 15 E&O Risks-And How To Avoid Them

Accidents happen. But when it's an errors and omissions oversight, that accident can open your...

We'll Show You How to Reach Your Sales Goals

Whether you work alone or have a team of agents working for you, we can...

Claims Connection eNewsletter

Breaking news on disasters, fraud, legal trends, technology, and CE initiatives for the P&C claim professional – FREE. Sign Up Now!

Claims-Handling Guidelines

Claims Magazine is providing the following free guidelines and regulations in order to help adjusting professionals stay abreast of each state’s unique property and casualty claim-handling requirements.

View our State Guidelines »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.