From the February 13, 2012 issue of National Underwriter Property & Casualty • Subscribe!

A (Speculative) Sneak Peek at FIO Report

The much-awaited Federal Insurance Office (FIO) report on reforming and modernizing state insurance regulation, mandated by Dodd-Frank, likely will not be unveiled until the end of this month or early March.

However, sources are already suggesting that one component of the report will be the resurrection of a proposal first put forward in 2004: the SMART Act, or State Modernization and Regulatory Transparency Act.

The SMART Act would have, in theory, created a state-national partnership on insurance oversight. Among other intentions, the bill was meant to reform agent-licensing rules and set uniform market-conduct standards and speed-to-market initiatives. It also would have imposed commercial- and personal-lines rate and form modifications.

By resurrecting the SMART Act, the Obama administration, facing a tough re-election battle, would be able to point out that the starting point for modernization would be legislation sponsored by the then-Republican leadership of the House Financial Services Committee.

That would diminish the argument likely to be advanced by states’-rights supporters and conservative critics that the report’s recommendations constitute a power grab by the federal government.

Many industry officials would likely support a revival of the SMART Act because it would call for a phased move to an open-competition model that would allow companies to raise and lower rates without prior regulatory approval.

And taking steps to ease multistate licensing for producers—a key component of the SMART Act—would surely meet with widespread agreement.

In its comment letter to the FIO on insurance modernization, officials of the Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers of America (IIABA) write that, “Obtaining and maintaining the necessary licenses is often a costly, burdensome and time-consuming endeavor, and the need to focus on these administrative matters hinders the ability of insurance agents and brokers to effectively address the needs of consumers.”

But those who support the current regulatory system voiced vehement opposition to the original SMART Act proposal.

For example, in a 2005 report, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners said the legislation would substantially and negatively impact state regulatory authority to supervise P&C, life and health insurance, as well as reinsurance, by establishing federally mandated standards and pre-empting state laws.

In addition to the FIO report basing some of its proposals on the SMART Act, industry insiders expect the report will acknowledge that the federal government will have to play a stronger role in international regulation.

Even advocates of continued state regulation are sure to support calls for FIO and its parent, the Treasury Department, to play a strong role in international insurance, given recent protectionist policies in certain countries and demand for much higher capital standards for financial companies with global businesses.

For example, in comment letters to FIO, the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI) and one of its members, Liberty Mutual, note that only the federal government has the power to prevent imposition of “bank-centric” international financial regulation by Europeans.

According to several industry officials, they also expect the  FIO report to outline ways of dealing with important consumer issues, including the affordability and availability of P&C insurance.

About the Author
Arthur D. Postal

Arthur D. Postal

Regulatory & Compliance News Editor for LifeHealthPro.com, Arthur “Dave” Postal is a veteran reporter covering Washington, D.C. and federal insurance regulation. He has more than 30 years of experience in financial journalism, and is well-known in Washington circles as a dogged enterprise reporter with a knack for highlighting forward-looking trend analysis on regulatory matters. He also writes for National Underwriter Life & Health and National Underwriter Property & Casualty magazines and contributes legislative and regulatory news to PropertyCasualty360.com. He can be reached at apostal@sbmedia.com.

Comments

Resource Center

View All »

Complimentary White Paper: The Compression of Workplace Time

How brokers and carriers respond to the compression of workplace time will create significant competitive...

The Changing Insurance Consumer: 6 Ways to Create Profitable Relationships

Today’s mobile and web-savvy consumers have new expectations when it comes to interacting with your...

Contractors General Liability Coverage 102

What is a prior work exclusion? Which option is right for my client? Why do...

Sign up today to get a 50% matching credit -...

Insurance marketing sometimes seems like it's a game of swings and misses, but we're here...

Guide: 5 Steps to Selling Cyber

Cyber risk and data security is on the agenda of every business owner and executive....

Citation Correlation

Do rigger and signalperson qualifications correlate with the cause of crane and rigging accidents? ...

Complete Guide to Electronic Signatures in Property & Casualty Insurance...

In property and casualty insurance, closing new business quickly is key. Learn how to leverage...

INSTANT ACCESS: Complimentary Sales Closer Questionnaires

Help property owners or managers compare your commercial residential property insurance coverage vs. the competition....

Determining Vacant Property Perils and Valuations

Are your clients fully covered for Vacant Properties? In this economic climate, your insureds may...

Risk Management for Law Firms

This package of 3 concise risk management articles offers straightforward content and practical suggestions law...

PropertyCasualty360 Daily eNews

Get P&C insurance news to stay ahead of the competition in one concise format - FREE. Sign Up Now!

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.