Opinion: Aiming for Claims Adjusting Excellence

Improving Claims 'Bedside Manner'

One reason often cited for skyrocketing medical costs is the proliferation of malpractice claims. Physicians prescribe too many tests to avoid missing a diagnosis and inviting a lawsuit. Meanwhile, insurers charge high premiums to cover doctors in case they find themselves on the receiving end of a lawsuit. On the flip side, a tremendous amount of research goes into who is suing whom and why.

The results of this research and application to property adjusting may be surprising to many in the P&C realm, however.

In the study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), “Physician-Patient Communication: The Relationship with Malpractice Claims Among Primary Care Physicians and Surgeons,” Researcher Wendy Levinson reviews the legal records of hundreds of physicians, classifying them into two groups: those who had been sued and those who had not.

The results are eye-opening. Levinson found that a doctor’s experience with malpractice suits did not correlate strictly with medical errors or mistakes. The doctors who merely spent three minutes longer talking with a patient or explaining a procedure (18.3 versus 15 minutes) significantly reduced, if not eliminated, the number of malpractice claims by their patients. Simply using more statements of orientation (educating patients about what to expect), engaging in active listening, and laughing and using humor offered a dramatically different outcome. In other instances patients felt rushed or disrespected during an office visit.

The doctors, who were less likely to be sued even when they made a mistake, did not necessarily provide higher quality care or better services. The distinction was entirely indicative of how they spoke to their patients. Levinson’s study identifies primary care physicians who gave more specific and teachable communications with greatly fewer malpractice claims, and a much higher level of patient satisfaction, even with a poor medical result.

Claims Isn’t Brain Surgery

Indeed, handling claims isn’t brain surgery, but there is much to learn and adapt from the medical field when it comes to communications.

In the P&C claims industry, we often look at resumes and credentials such as post-nominal titles as the only qualifier of competence. We place more importance on testing an adjuster’s knowledge of how to measure a roof as opposed to interpersonal skills and their ability to connect with customers.

Technical expertise is vital, but we greatly underestimate the communication effectiveness of the claims handler during the process. This is the defining moment in customer retention and potential liabilities.

Walking in Their Shoes

If we look at claims through the eyes of the customer, then we can see an entirely different process. Which do you think a customer would choose?

  • A slightly longer claims cycle that would involve more collaboration and personal attention from the adjuster.
  • A 24-hour first contact and faster claims closure.

Most customers would choose the first option. To that end, it is crucial that adjusters take a few minutes to explain options upfront and patiently walk the customer through the process.

Just as doctors are the experts when it comes to medicine, we are the experts when it comes to claims adjustment. We know how the process works. If we take the time to explain the process using more facilitation (soliciting opinions, checking understanding, and encouraging a dialogue), then we will go a long way to ensuring that our customers are satisfied with the outcome and remain loyal to us.

It comes down to a matter of respect. To humanize the customer experience in claims, the adjuster must improve his or her bedside manner. The business culture must be changed to redefine customer satisfaction and alter the usual course of actions in claims that leads to unhappy customers. It is essential to encourage adjusters to spend more time with the customer so they better understand how the claims process works. It is also important to educate adjusters in active listening skills.

Page 1 of 2
Comments

Resource Center

View All »

Contractors General Liability Coverage 102

What is a prior work exclusion? Which option is right for my client? Why do...

Sign up today to get a 50% matching credit -...

Insurance marketing sometimes seems like it's a game of swings and misses, but we're here...

Guide: 5 Steps to Selling Cyber

Cyber risk and data security is on the agenda of every business owner and executive....

Citation Correlation

Do rigger and signalperson qualifications correlate with the cause of crane and rigging accidents? ...

Complete Guide to Electronic Signatures in Property & Casualty Insurance...

In property and casualty insurance, closing new business quickly is key. Learn how to leverage...

INSTANT ACCESS: Complimentary Sales Closer Questionnaires

Help property owners or managers compare your commercial residential property insurance coverage vs. the competition....

Determining Vacant Property Perils and Valuations

Are your clients fully covered for Vacant Properties? In this economic climate, your insureds may...

Risk Management for Law Firms

This package of 3 concise risk management articles offers straightforward content and practical suggestions law...

Guide: Top 15 E&O Risks-And How To Avoid Them

Accidents happen. But when it's an errors and omissions oversight, that accident can open your...

We'll Show You How to Reach Your Sales Goals

Whether you work alone or have a team of agents working for you, we can...

Claims Connection eNewsletter

Breaking news on disasters, fraud, legal trends, technology, and CE initiatives for the P&C claim professional – FREE. Sign Up Now!

Claims-Handling Guidelines

Claims Magazine is providing the following free guidelines and regulations in order to help adjusting professionals stay abreast of each state’s unique property and casualty claim-handling requirements.

View our State Guidelines »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.