Drivers of ERM in 2012: The End of the World?

The world could end this year—on Dec. 21, to be precise. Doomsday theorists have hyped 2012 as the year of Armageddon, citing the predictions of ancient texts from the Egyptians and Mayans as supporting evidence. Others say Nostradamus may have predicted that a significant cataclysmic event, such as a comet impact, will devastate the earth in 2012.

News reports have highlighted people who are stocking up on supplies in preparation for humankind’s grand finale, and we have seen “end-of-the-world shelter” companies selling public bunker space. Although this may seem a bit kooky, insurance company risk professionals may benefit in 2012 from the strategy of “hope for the best, plan for the worst.”

An ORSA Guidance Manual finalized by the NAIC in November of 2011 is now moving toward review and implementation by the Financial Condition E Committee. The Manual highlights principles to consider in drafting the annual ORSA Summary Report, and documenting company risk policies and procedures. As a first step, feedback will be collected in the coming months from five to 10 insurance groups, in order to develop further company guidance, as well as educational materials for regulators. The NAIC is also coordinating heavily with international regulators to improve consistency with international frameworks. The mechanics of how the NAIC will collect the ORSA Summary Reports, and how exactly regulators will provide any feedback, will likely be solidified this year.

Once the ORSA details become clearer, a ripple effect may also occur through smaller carriers not expressly subject to any statutory requirement. Several major rating agencies have also expressed their expectations that rated insurers develop a proper ERM framework, and establish capital funding protocols to assess the company’s assets in light of their key risks and strategic risk appetite.

  • There will likely be ongoing issues regarding the implementation of Dodd-Frank ‘s general consumer protection provisions, with potential spill-over into insurance. For example, the scope of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection is not fully established yet, and provisions regarding lending practices and fair trade, deceptive acts and the like could potentially be expanded to some insurance products, particularly on the life side where some popular products are very similar to investments. Overall, insurer marketing and product development activities may face increased scrutiny. 
  • We can also anticipate ongoing questions about which insurance institutions are covered under the “systemically important” designation, which would make certain carriers subject to heightened regulation. Proposed guidelines were issued in November from the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), to provide important information on how systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) would be identified and which insurers could be candidates for the designation.  
  • Changes are afoot for excess and surplus lines carriers, as the FIO will be working with the NAIC, the states and industry leaders on details of implementing related provisions within Dodd-Frank which were previously contained in the Non-admitted Reform and Reinsurance Act. These provisions will preempt or supersede portions of the excess and surplus lines law as they exist today in each state. Of note, states are currently working to adopt uniform, national surplus lines tax allocation procedures which will lead to significant operational, technological, and reporting changes for carriers.
  • Reeling from Health Care Reform

    Responding to both state and federal initiatives, companies will continue to struggle with health care reform issues, as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act continues to reshape America's health care system. While the initiatives promulgated to date aspire to lay the groundwork for a more efficient and sustainable health care system, the “devil is in the details.”

    In 2012, companies will be working hard to better understand the nature of the natural catastrophes which have caused “surprise” losses. According to Willis Re Chairman Peter Hearn, “The poor results of 2011 appear to be largely an earnings event, though insurance company managers are concerned that should 2012 perform in a similar fashion they will be facing capital issues in 12 months’ time.”

    On the related regulatory front, Congress recently extended the authority of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) through May 31, 2012. This latest extension was a stop-gap funding measure, while Congress completes work on a five-year NFIP re-authorization bill to provide more clarity, certainty and avoid further disruption to real estate and insurance markets. The legislation (HR 1309) approved by the House Financial Services Committee authorizes the program until 2016, and phases out the program’s rate subsidies. Over time, companies expect that premiums will be allowed to rise to reflect actual costs. Insurers will also be paying close attention to modifications of flood maps to improve their accuracy, which may significantly impact property carrier risk profiles.

    Featured Video

    Most Recent Videos

    Video Library ››

    Top Story

    Hosting a Super Bowl 50 party? Watch out for these 5 risks

    Follow these five tips to keep your guests and your home safe during your Super Bowl 50 party.

    Top Story

    Win big with these 7 food safety tips for your Super Bowl 50 party

    Avoid food safety penalties at your Super Bowl party by following these seven tips.

    More Resources


    eNewsletter Sign Up

    PropertyCasualty360 Daily eNews

    Get P&C insurance news to stay ahead of the competition in one concise format - FREE. Sign Up Now!

    Mobile Phone

    Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.