Bill Closing Tax Loophole For 'Offshores' Introduced

NU Online News Service, July 31, 10:55 a.m. EDT

WASHINGTON--Controversial legislation that would bar foreign-owned insurers from moving their U.S. earnings into tax havens through a reinsurance transaction with an affiliate was introduced late Thursday in the House.

The legislation was introduced by Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., chairman of the Subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures of the House Ways and Means Committee.

It immediately prompted a flurry of responses from groups and individuals on both sides of the issue.

Opposing the bill was the Coalition for Competitive Insurance Rates, which includes Bermuda insurers and members of the Risk and Insurance Management Society.

In a statement, the group said the bill "would drive up consumer insurance rates by reducing competition and critical U.S. insurance capacity."

The statement added, "When Rep. Neal introduced similar legislation in the 110th Congress, consumer organizations and businesses that rely on affordable insurance coverage joined in opposing passage."

But William R. Berkley, chairman and chief executive officer of the W.R. Berkley Corporation, Greenwich, Conn., said in an interview that in criticizing the legislation, "Bermuda reinsurers are using scare tactics."

He observed that the U.S. represents almost half of the property and casualty insurance premiums written in the world. "These people with all this capital are not going to close their companies," he said.

Regarding the claim that the legislation would make it more difficult and expensive to provide insurance in catastrophe-prone areas, Mr. Berkley said Bermuda insurers primarily write casualty insurance, not property insurance, and then reinsure it offshore with an affiliate.

"This does not involve property insurance used to insure homes and businesses," he said. "Bermuda people are just trying to confuse the issue."

Mr. Berkley also said he has become involved in the issue because the business has evolved from a small component of the p&c industry to a much larger percentage of the industry--roughly $35 billion of direct premiums written in the U.S.

"And, it is growing at a substantial rate," he added.

Specifically, the legislation would disallow deductions for excess reinsurance premiums with respect to U.S. risks paid to affiliated insurance companies that are not subject to U.S. tax.

Rep. Neal said the excess amount will be determined by reference to an industry fraction, by line of business, which will measure the average amount of reinsurance sent to unrelated parties by U.S. companies.

He said the bill "allows foreign groups to avoid the deduction disallowance by electing to be treated as a U.S. taxpayer with respect to the income from affiliate reinsurance."

Thus, he said, the bill merely restores a level playing field, treating U.S. insurers and foreign-based insurers alike. The legislation provides Treasury the authority to carry out or prevent the avoidance of the provisions of this bill, Rep. Neal said in a statement on the House floor.

But critics of the legislation disagreed.

"Legislation that encumbers the free market movement and the transfer of risk that are vital to a sound global insurance and reinsurance community will adversely affect America's commercial insurance purchasers," said Joseph Restoule, president of RIMS.

"A free and fair marketplace enables the insured and insurers to seek innovative and affordable alternatives to manage risk," Mr. Restoule said. "This legislation would drive up the cost of insurance for America's commercial insurance consumers by reducing competition."

Opponents of the bill say the legislation is especially unnecessary because foreign-based insurers are already subject to a U.S. insurance excise tax and their U.S. subsidiaries also pay U.S. income taxes.

"Rep. Neal's bill is a protectionist measure that will hurt American consumers," said Eli Lehrer, a senior fellow with the Competitive Enterprise Institute. "It's likely to send insurance rates soaring for the very consumers who can least afford big rate increases right now."

Comments

Resource Center

View All »

Complimentary Case Study: Helping achieve your financial goals By:...

Find out how a Special Investigation Union used TLOxp to save the company money and...

Do Your Clients Hold The Right CDL License?

Learn about the various classes of CDL Licenses and the industries that are impacted by...

Integrated Content & Communications: A Key Business Issue For Insurers

Insurers are renewing their focus on top line growth, and many are learning that growth...

High Risk Insurance Coverage in the E&S Market

Experts discuss market conditions, trends and projected growth in a rapidly changing niche.

Top E-Signature Security Requirements

This white paper covers the most important security features to look for when evaluating e-signatures...

EPLI Programs Crafted Just For Your Clients

Bring us your restaurant clients, associations and other groups and we’ll help you win more...

Is It Time To Step Up And Own An Agency?

Download this eBook for insight on how to determine if owning an agency is right...

Claims - The Good The Bad And The Ugly

Fraudulent claims cost the industry and the public thousands of dollars in losses. This article...

Leveraging BI for Improved Claims Performance and Results

If claims organizations do not avail themselves of the latest business intelligence (BI) tools, they...

Top 10 Legal Requirements for E-Signatures in Insurance

Want to make sure you’ve covered all your bases when adopting e-signatures? Learn how to...

PropertyCasualty360 Daily eNews

Get P&C insurance news to stay ahead of the competition in one concise format - FREE. Sign Up Now!

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.