Bill Closing Tax Loophole For 'Offshores' Introduced

NU Online News Service, July 31, 10:55 a.m. EDT

WASHINGTON--Controversial legislation that would bar foreign-owned insurers from moving their U.S. earnings into tax havens through a reinsurance transaction with an affiliate was introduced late Thursday in the House.

The legislation was introduced by Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., chairman of the Subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures of the House Ways and Means Committee.

It immediately prompted a flurry of responses from groups and individuals on both sides of the issue.

Opposing the bill was the Coalition for Competitive Insurance Rates, which includes Bermuda insurers and members of the Risk and Insurance Management Society.

In a statement, the group said the bill "would drive up consumer insurance rates by reducing competition and critical U.S. insurance capacity."

The statement added, "When Rep. Neal introduced similar legislation in the 110th Congress, consumer organizations and businesses that rely on affordable insurance coverage joined in opposing passage."

But William R. Berkley, chairman and chief executive officer of the W.R. Berkley Corporation, Greenwich, Conn., said in an interview that in criticizing the legislation, "Bermuda reinsurers are using scare tactics."

He observed that the U.S. represents almost half of the property and casualty insurance premiums written in the world. "These people with all this capital are not going to close their companies," he said.

Regarding the claim that the legislation would make it more difficult and expensive to provide insurance in catastrophe-prone areas, Mr. Berkley said Bermuda insurers primarily write casualty insurance, not property insurance, and then reinsure it offshore with an affiliate.

"This does not involve property insurance used to insure homes and businesses," he said. "Bermuda people are just trying to confuse the issue."

Mr. Berkley also said he has become involved in the issue because the business has evolved from a small component of the p&c industry to a much larger percentage of the industry--roughly $35 billion of direct premiums written in the U.S.

"And, it is growing at a substantial rate," he added.

Specifically, the legislation would disallow deductions for excess reinsurance premiums with respect to U.S. risks paid to affiliated insurance companies that are not subject to U.S. tax.

Rep. Neal said the excess amount will be determined by reference to an industry fraction, by line of business, which will measure the average amount of reinsurance sent to unrelated parties by U.S. companies.

He said the bill "allows foreign groups to avoid the deduction disallowance by electing to be treated as a U.S. taxpayer with respect to the income from affiliate reinsurance."

Thus, he said, the bill merely restores a level playing field, treating U.S. insurers and foreign-based insurers alike. The legislation provides Treasury the authority to carry out or prevent the avoidance of the provisions of this bill, Rep. Neal said in a statement on the House floor.

But critics of the legislation disagreed.

"Legislation that encumbers the free market movement and the transfer of risk that are vital to a sound global insurance and reinsurance community will adversely affect America's commercial insurance purchasers," said Joseph Restoule, president of RIMS.

"A free and fair marketplace enables the insured and insurers to seek innovative and affordable alternatives to manage risk," Mr. Restoule said. "This legislation would drive up the cost of insurance for America's commercial insurance consumers by reducing competition."

Opponents of the bill say the legislation is especially unnecessary because foreign-based insurers are already subject to a U.S. insurance excise tax and their U.S. subsidiaries also pay U.S. income taxes.

"Rep. Neal's bill is a protectionist measure that will hurt American consumers," said Eli Lehrer, a senior fellow with the Competitive Enterprise Institute. "It's likely to send insurance rates soaring for the very consumers who can least afford big rate increases right now."

Comments

Resource Center

View All »

Contractors General Liability Coverage 102

What is a prior work exclusion? Which option is right for my client? Why do...

Sign up today to get a 50% matching credit -...

Insurance marketing sometimes seems like it's a game of swings and misses, but we're here...

Guide: 5 Steps to Selling Cyber

Cyber risk and data security is on the agenda of every business owner and executive....

Citation Correlation

Do rigger and signalperson qualifications correlate with the cause of crane and rigging accidents? ...

Complete Guide to Electronic Signatures in Property & Casualty Insurance...

In property and casualty insurance, closing new business quickly is key. Learn how to leverage...

INSTANT ACCESS: Complimentary Sales Closer Questionnaires

Help property owners or managers compare your commercial residential property insurance coverage vs. the competition....

Determining Vacant Property Perils and Valuations

Are your clients fully covered for Vacant Properties? In this economic climate, your insureds may...

Risk Management for Law Firms

This package of 3 concise risk management articles offers straightforward content and practical suggestions law...

Guide: Top 15 E&O Risks-And How To Avoid Them

Accidents happen. But when it's an errors and omissions oversight, that accident can open your...

We'll Show You How to Reach Your Sales Goals

Whether you work alone or have a team of agents working for you, we can...

PropertyCasualty360 Daily eNews

Get P&C insurance news to stay ahead of the competition in one concise format - FREE. Sign Up Now!

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.