The regulatory environment is complicated by a surfeit of policies and regulations. (Credit: Kasitthanin/AdobeStock)
In today's technology-driven business world, Chief Risk Officers (CROs) have assumed a more strategic organizational role. Gone are the days when risk management oscillated between compliance and financial risk mitigation. In the age of artificial intelligence, cyber threats, regulatory complexities, and trade war uncertainties, CROs need to strike a balance between changing regulations, data privacy, and security risks, navigating a web of issues that directly bear on business resilience and success.
1. AI-driven risks and ethical governance
Cybercriminals are automating attacks using AI, which are difficult to uproot and can coerce human behavior via sophisticated social engineering strategies. And whether companies use AI for cyber defense purposes or to facilitate systems and production, the ethical implications of using AI, including algorithmic bias, data privacy, and regulatory matters, add to CRO’s workloads.
To counter AI risks, CROs must engage with stakeholders to create ethical AI governance frameworks that ensure AI's safe application and accountability. They should implement procedures for continuous AI monitoring, track model integrity, and detect emerging risks in real time.
2. Navigating regulatory compliance and emerging AI laws
The regulatory environment is complicated by a surfeit of policies and regulations. It is changing fast with new AI governance acts, cybersecurity rules, and data privacy regulations surfacing internationally. CROs must navigate duplicative and intricate compliance obligations, making their businesses compliant with legislative mandates without incurring hefty penalties or slowing productivity.
If not already using them, CROs can utilize GRC platforms that include regulatory monitoring, auditing, and reporting features for easier compliance management. Third-party specialists can be brought in as partners to evaluate the existing compliance and cybersecurity posture, helping to carry the load with in-house teams.
3. Managing third-party vendor risks
Organizations are increasingly dependent on third-party vendors and supply chain partners. Yet, a vendor's poor security stance can topple an organization's compliance initiative and leave sensitive data vulnerable to cyberattacks. According to the 2025 Security Scorecard Global Third-Party Breach Report, breaches accounted for 35.5% of all breaches in 2024, and 41% of ransomware and extortion attacks included a third-party breach component.
CROs must institute a sound third-party risk management program that assesses vendor security procedures, compliance with regulatory requirements, and regular monitoring of the vendor's risk posture. Ongoing security monitoring and contractual risk assessments can enable organizations to counteract possible disruptions from external collaborations.
4. Evolution of cybersecurity threats
Cyberattacks are becoming more elaborate and destructive. Ransomware attacks are no longer simple encryption-based attacks but have become double and triple extortion attacks, stealing sensitive data and crippling business operations along with encrypting data, posing new challenges for CROs.
CROs must aim to protect the infrastructure, information, and reputation of their organization by minimizing the impact and frequency of cyberattacks. This would require a proactive approach involving a solid security posture, strong backup and recovery procedures, and a definite incident response plan. As part of a multi-layered defense strategy, cybersecurity training programs must be implemented to increase employee awareness which has the power to preclude, and confine cyberattacks.
5. Identity and access management challenges
As companies move to multi-cloud infrastructures, identity and access management (IAM) is becoming more complicated. The expansion in digital identities—encompassing human users, machine accounts, and privileged access—amplifies security risks. Poor user life cycle management and unsuitable role-based access control policies can hamper threat response efforts.
CROs must employ AI-driven IAM solutions to extend adaptive access controls to users based on their location and their activity through data-driven insights. This minimizes unauthorized access and offers a smooth experience for legitimate users. AI can streamline the entire user access life cycle from onboarding to deactivation by analyzing job roles and access needs to automatically provision or revoke permissions.
6. Balancing innovation and risk in SaaS adoption
SaaS applications transformed corporate functions with remote work, automation, and responsiveness. However, SaaS environments are subject to data security risks, shadow IT, and recently, shadow AI.
CROs must create clear SaaS usage policies that require advanced approval to incorporate third-party applications into business processes. They must also implement SaaS management platforms that provide real-time visibility into user activity, access controls, and data transfers between SaaS applications.
7. Convincing the board to emphasize risk management
Although the board has become more conscious of the need for risk management and cybersecurity, communication barriers can persist, hobbling prioritization. Technical security metrics may not be appropriate in terms of attracting executive interest, making it challenging for CROs to convey the business value of their risk mitigation proposals.
CROs must build risk quantification models, leverage business-relevant security metrics, and report data-driven intelligence that will emphasize the strategic benefits of proactive risk management efforts.
8. Developing organizational resilience
By developing a risk-conscious culture, CROs can build organizational resilience so that the business can function properly despite disruption, security incidents, or regulatory shifts. By redefining risk management as a positive business driver instead of incident response, CROs can better position resilience as part of the corporate strategy.
Chief Risk Officers can balance innovation, resilience, and compliance in a technology-driven world. They can look beyond traditional security strategies to construct resilient systems that will lead to strategic growth. In short, they ensure the business is adequately prepared to move forward despite adverse conditions.
About the Author
Steve Durbin is Chief Executive of the Information Security Forum, an independent association dedicated to investigating, clarifying, and resolving key issues in information security and risk management by developing best practice methodologies, processes, and solutions that meet the business needs of its members. ISF membership comprises the Fortune 500 and Forbes 2000.
© Arc, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to TMSalesOperations@arc-network.com. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.