Facing shrinking resources, an uncertain economy as well as changing political and regulatory landscapes, risk managers might be forced to reassess their particular captive insurance solutions, a new white paper by ACE suggests.
The paper–"Darwinism at Work? How the Current Economy and the Market Impact Captives and Risk Managers"–was released by ACE at the Vermont Captive Insurance Association annual conference in Burlington last month.
"It's not a question of whether captives will be around, but more how they fit into overall expense management and enterprise risk management strategies," according to Carol A. Frey, vice president at ACE Risk Management, who co-authored the report with Linda Kane, senior vice president with ACE Financial Solutions.
According to the report, threats and challenges associated with captives for risk managers include:
o The global recession: Reevaluation of capital utilization, management oversight costs and softening commercial market cycles may tempt buyers to consider insurance programs with lower retentions, alternative deductibles and retentions, or non-captive fronting alternatives and risk- transfer alternatives.
o Financial crisis fallout and subsequent reforms: Regulatory reforms in the United States and abroad will impact insurance company and captive capitalization requirements. Captives must keep pace with organizational, statutory, or other externally imposed regulations, the paper said.
o Resources: Risk managers are doing more with less in this difficult economy, so the amount of resources required for captive management and controls may overshadow the captive's long-term strategic value proposition.
Ms. Frey told National Underwriter at the VCIA conference that acquisitions have also prompted risk managers to question captive costs and whether they need to maintain multiple captives that sometimes duplicate coverages.
Risk managers facing such a scenario may need to do a "re-feasibility study," she suggested, noting that buyers need to determine whether to keep multiple captives open, consolidate captives, choose the captive that can be the most effective over the long term, or transfer risks back to an insurer.
Changes in organizations–such as the appointment of a new chief financial officer with no knowledge of captives–also can present challenges. Here, education is required, she noted, warning that new management can also trigger a demand for detailed information on costs associated with the captive, such as management and actuarial fees.
"From the carrier perspective, we're trying to be sensitive to what the clients are trying to achieve," she said. "We're trying to put options out there for them."
Once an analysis is complete, Ms. Frey noted, risk managers may ultimately decide not to make any changes, but the process helps them become more aware of options available to them.
While the solutions for the current challenges will be unique for each risk manager and the organization's enterprise approach, the study found that captives are clearly able to survive and thrive when they are supported at the highest levels of an organization–and when the captive is used in a way that provides the maximum financial and risk management benefits.
© Arc, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to TMSalesOperations@arc-network.com. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.