http://www.propertycasualty360.com/2010/05/04/intellectual-property-theft-risk-worries-biotech-execs/ http://www.propertycasualty360.com/2010/05/04/intellectual-property-theft-risk-worries-biotech-execs/

Executives at a large number of biotechnology firms are concerned that their companies could be targeted by intellectual property thieves, according to a risk management survey.

The study, sponsored by the Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) and Medical Device Manufacturers Association (MDMA), found that 42% of the executives surveyed indicated they were most concerned about exposure to intellectual property theft.

One expert said that by limiting their risk such firms may improve their investment profile.

Thirty percent of respondents identified product recalls, tampering and lawsuits as major threats. One in five executives (21%) were most concerned about a loss of income due to a property loss at a key supplier or customer.

"Our survey demonstrates that life science companies have a strong understanding of the risks they face, and that they need to take measures necessary to help mitigate those exposures," Philip Fiscus, senior vice president of Warren, N.J.-based Chubb & Son and worldwide life sciences manager for Chubb Commercial Insurance said in a statement.

"Biotech firms that mitigate their exposures are far more likely to attract the limited number of investment dollars available today," Jim Greenwood, president and chief executive officer of BIO said.

"Solid risk management and insurance programs are vital to the viability and growth of our members," said Mark Leahey, president and chief executive officer of MDMA.

Mr. Fiscus said the theft of a company's intellectual property due to cyber or other crime could mean missed milestones, lost venture capital funding, disrupted clinical trials, and ultimately, possible substantial financial losses. "Today's intellectual property thieves, especially cyber criminals, are more organized and more precise in the information they target," he said.

The survey also found that 25% of the life science companies imported chemicals or other pharmaceutical raw materials from suppliers outside the United States and Canada.

In response to exposure concerns, survey respondents indicated they have taken the following actions in addition to existing protocols:

  • Implemented new policies and procedures to qualify suppliers (62%).
  • Implemented additional testing measures (62%).
  • Required foreign suppliers to carry product liability insurance in the United States and/or Canada (51%).
  • Stopped doing business with certain suppliers (28%).
  • Halted importing certain chemicals or other pharmaceutical materials (20%).

"In today's economy, product recall plans are an important component of a life science company's risk management plan," Mr. Fiscus said. "Some suppliers may be looking for ways to save money, potentially creating quality control issues and an additional financial burden for life science companies."

Chubb's Life Sciences Risk Management Survey was conducted by telephone with 500 CEOs, chief financial officers, controllers and others who make insurance purchasing decisions.

The Biotechnology Industry Organization represents more than 1,000 biotechnology companies, academic institutions, state biotechnology centers and related organizations in all 50 U.S. states and 33 other nations, Chubb said.

The Medical Device Manufacturers Association is a national trade association representing small and medium sized medical technology companies. Its member companies seek to promote policies that provide patients and clinicians with timely access to safe and effective products.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© Touchpoint Markets, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to TMSalesOperations@arc-network.com. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.