Kemper Runoff Moves Could Spark Suits
By Daniel Hays
NU Online News Service, May 25, 10:53 a.m. EDT?The firm supervising the Kemper Insurance Companies' runoff is using such hardball tactics to squeeze out revenues that some clients are considering taking them to court, according to a policyholder source. [@@]
In addition, two weeks ago the Marsh brokerage advised its clients that they should "consult with legal counsel" over some of the moves Long Grove, Ill.-based Kemper has made under the stewardship of Kenning Financial Advisors.
Marsh, in its May 13 letter, said that several clients had asked to be put into contact with other Kemper policyholders interested in discussing issues related to the runoff.
Kenning Financial Advisors referred all questions to Kemper representative Linda Kingman, who objected to a report using the views of "one disgruntled policyholder." and said the firm is awaiting a decision by the Illinois Insurance Department on the runoff plan.
A Kemper policyholder representative who asked for anonymity because of potential legal ramifications said the department's use of Kenning and its chief executive officer, Michael Coutu, were particularly irksome.
The policyholder said the firm was rejecting millions in claims and seeking money for costs that went back many years, in addition to ending dividends.
"This guy (Coutu) gets a fat bonus to run off the company by reneging on agreements and extorting policyholders," the policyholder complained.
According to the Marsh letter: "The rejection of dividends affects Kemper's ability to offset some or all of additional premiums now due under loss-sensitive programs. Deferred balances, historically offset by the initial dividend will become due and payable. Policyholders are already receiving bills for any additional premiums due as a result of this decision."
Marsh said Kemper might try to buy back policies, substitute another insurer through novation, or "accept a settlement at less than what you perceive is fair value." The broker said it is preparing a white paper to help clients understand their options and also advised they consult an attorney.
Marsh noted that the main Kemper carrier–Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Company–reported that Kenning executives would be compensated by a base fee and target bonuses in a still undisclosed runoff plan.
Since Lumberman is owned by its policyholders, Marsh suggested that the interest of the state and Kemper management might be misaligned since the owners of the company are also its creditors.
Jack Messmore, a representative for the Illinois Insurance Department, said of the possibility of legal action: "There are lawsuits every day involving policyholders and insurance companies. Those suits would have to be worked out in the courts."
Kemper in an e-mailed statement said the company's financial situation "has forced us to take some actions we would rather not have taken. We have had to close offices around the country and reduce our workforce by thousands of people.
"Our board of directors has determined we can no longer pay discretionary dividends, which some policyholders may have anticipated would reduce their premium expenses. Further, the Illinois Insurance Code prohibits the payment of dividends if an insurance company does not have sufficient earned surplus.
"As of year-end 2003, Kemper's earned surplus was negative and remains so. We have undertaken aggressive expense control initiatives, and are in discussions with some of our insureds to "buy back" their policies in order to reduce Kemper's future loss exposure. These are necessary steps to preserve the company's assets for the payment of claims."
© Arc, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to TMSalesOperations@arc-network.com. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.