Name Change Sparks Feud Between Agent/Broker Groups
Washington
A dispute has erupted between two major insurance agent groups over who represents the concerns of large commercial brokerages.
The battle between the Washington-based Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers and the Alexandria, Va.-based Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers of America emerged after IIABA changed its name from the Independent Insurance Agents of America.
The dispute apparently stems from a statement in a news release issued by IIABA on its decision to add the term "brokers" to its title.
In the release, IIABA President Thomas Ahart noted that most of the largest agencies and brokerage firms in the country are members of IIABA.
"IIABA is the only national trade group that represents the legislative concerns of agents and brokers at both the federal level and on a permanent basis in state legislatures and insurance departments," he added.
John Van Osdall, chairman of CIAB, which has traditionally represented large commercial brokerages, responded by noting the "stark differences" that have defined CIAB and IIABA.
"For example, we strongly support broad deregulation of commercial lines, whereas individual IIAA affiliates have blocked commercial lines deregulation efforts in many states," Mr. Van Osdall said.
"On the agent/broker licensing issue, the Council has aggressively led reform efforts. But the promises of NARAB (the proposed National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers that was part of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act) have not been fully realized due to the efforts of several IIAA affiliates to reject full interstate agent/broker licensing reform," he said.
"The Council works hard to overturn anti-competitive countersignature laws," Mr. Van Osdall added. "IIAA has protected such onerous statutes despite a formal position of opposition."
Mr. Van Osdall also noted that the Council supports an optional national charter for insurance companies, while IIABA does not. Moreover, he said, the Council welcomes bank members and does not support the "continued, tired battle" against the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and national banks.
He added there are many issues of importance to commercial brokerages that IIABA has never addressed.
"There are a variety of international taxation and captive insurance company issues where IIAAs involvement would be new and welcome," he said.
Mr. Van Osdall added that the Council will continue its tradition of representing the top one percent of all brokers in the industry, which places more than 80 percent of all commercial p-c premiums.
Robert A. Rusbuldt, chief executive officer with IIABA, said that the associations president, Mr. Ahart, will be sending a letter to Mr. Van Osdall responding to all his comments, but the response will be private.
Mr. Rusbuldt said that if the Council has issues with who IIABA represents, these should be discussed in private.
Separately, the CIAB also released its first-quarter 2002 market index, which tracks premium rate changes, last week. For full details of the survey findings, see NUs Online News Service.
(An article appearing on page 12, identifying author Jeffrey Yates as an executive director for IIAA, went to press before the group announced its name change.)
Reproduced from National Underwriter Property & Casualty/Risk & Benefits Management Edition, April 22, 2002. Copyright 2002 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.
© Arc, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to TMSalesOperations@arc-network.com. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.