This complaint was first surfaced by Law.com Radar.

The settlement reached with the plaintiffs does not extend to suits by city or state governments or insurers.

The justices of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that a change in vehicles covered by an auto policy does not equate a "purchase" entitling the policyholders to another opportunity to waive UM/UIM stacking.

The case is being sent back down to lower courts for deliberation after the Missouri Supreme Court found that Geico should have a chance to defend itself against the claims.

A Florida homeowner claimed expenses for tearing out and accessing damaged plumbing should not be subject to the $5,000 cap because the endorsement did not limit "tear-out" expenses.

This guest column by Blakely Lloyd, J.D. discusses separation of insureds clauses and court cases.

A new litigation report is a warning shot to insurers that they must increase their resources—both in-house and outside counsel—in at least two segments of the industry.

New law takes aim at rising costs and claims transparency in Florida in addition to addressing safety of condos and co-ops

May a homeowners insurer may depreciate labor costs when calculating the actual cash value (ACV) after a covered loss?

The Missouri woman sued Geico claiming that she contracted a sexually transmitted disease from the car owner after the two had sex inside a car covered by the insurer.