A divided Georgia Supreme Court recently ruled that an insured can impose conditions on the carrier when trying to reach a settlement, including payment within a short time limit.

A divided Georgia Supreme Court on March 6 ruled that plaintiffs reaching a settlement agreement with an insurer over a motor vehicle accident can require the performance of a specific action — in this case, the time-limited payment of the demand.

The ruling, in which two justices dissented, expands the array of conditions plaintiffs’ attorneys may impose upon insurers, who may face bad-faith claims if they don’t agree to settle within the statutory requirements of the law.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

PropertyCasualty360

Join PropertyCasualty360

Don’t miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed decisions for your P&C insurance business. Join PropertyCasualty360.com now!

  • Unlimited access to PropertyCasualty360.com - your roadmap to thriving in a disrupted environment
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including BenefitsPRO.com, ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
  • Exclusive discounts on PropertyCasualty360, National Underwriter, Claims and ALM events

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join PropertyCasualty360

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.