Department of Labor Fines Railroad for Retaliation Against Whistleblowers

The U.S. Department of Labor has ordered Union Pacific Railroad Co., headquartered in Omaha, to pay a total of $400,000 in punitive damages, $90,315 in compensatory damages, $34,900 in attorney fees and more than $90,000 in back wages to three employees. Separate investigations by the Kansas City, Mo., and San Francisco, Calif., offices of the department's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) determined that the company violated the whistleblower protection provisions of the Federal Railroad Safety Act (FSRA) by terminating two employees and suspending one in retaliation for reporting workplace safety concerns and a work-related injury.

"Workers have the right to report work-related injuries and safety concerns without fear of retaliation," said Assistant Secretary for OSHA Dr. David Michaels. "Union Pacific Railroad has created a climate of fear instead of a climate of safety. The company must take immediate steps to change this unacceptable pattern of retaliation."

A Kansas City, Mo.-based Union Pacific Railroad conductor was terminated from employment in September 2010 after making repeated complaints to the company's hotline about safety concerns, such as fall and trip hazards, missing and obstructed roadway signs, and various right-of-way issues, and for noting that a supervisor violated safety procedures during a field test. The railroad also cited the conductor for having a tattoo that it deemed as creating a hostile work environment. The conductor received the tattoo, which commemorates his military service, prior to beginning his employment with the company in 2004.

OSHA ordered that the conductor be reinstated to his position and receive punitive damages of $150,000, attorney fees of $11,925, compensatory damages of $10,258.51 and biweekly back wages in the amount of $3,437.10 covering Sept. 15, 2010, through Jan. 1, 2011, as well as biweekly payments of $3,527.02 retroactive to Jan. 1, 2011, and continuing until a bona fide order of reinstatement is made by Union Pacific Railroad.

A second Kansas City, Mo.-based conductor was suspended without pay from his job for five days in November 2010 after making several complaints to the company's hotline regarding rough spots on the track. OSHA has ordered that the conductor receive punitive damages of $100,000, attorney fees of $10,725, compensatory damages of $5,056.50 and back wages in the amount of $2,170.79, representing loss of pay from a one-day investigative hearing and the five-day suspension.

The third Union Pacific Railroad employee, a locomotive engineer based in Tucson, Ariz., was terminated after reporting a workplace injury in August 2009. OSHA has ordered that the 32-year company employee receive $150,000 in punitive damages, $75,000 in compensatory damages and $12,250 in attorney fees.

This action follows two other orders issued by OSHA to Union Pacific Railroad in 2010 and 2011, which found that the company had similarly retaliated against other workers for reporting work-related injuries. The railroad operates in 23 states and employs more than 40,000 workers.

OSHA conducted the latest investigations under the whistleblower provisions of the FRSA, as amended by the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007. Railroad carriers are subject to the provisions of the FRSA, which protects employees who report violations of any federal law, rule or regulation relating to railroad safety or security, or who engage in other protected activities.

OSHA enforces the whistleblower provisions of the FRSA and 20 other statutes protecting employees who report violations of various airline, commercial motor carrier, consumer product, environmental, financial reform, food safety, health care reform, nuclear, pipeline, public transportation agency, railroad, maritime and securities laws.

Comments

Resource Center

View All »

Contractors General Liability Coverage 102

What is a prior work exclusion? Which option is right for my client? Why do...

Sign up today to get a 50% matching credit -...

Insurance marketing sometimes seems like it's a game of swings and misses, but we're here...

Guide: 5 Steps to Selling Cyber

Cyber risk and data security is on the agenda of every business owner and executive....

Citation Correlation

Do rigger and signalperson qualifications correlate with the cause of crane and rigging accidents? ...

Complete Guide to Electronic Signatures in Property & Casualty Insurance...

In property and casualty insurance, closing new business quickly is key. Learn how to leverage...

INSTANT ACCESS: Complimentary Sales Closer Questionnaires

Help property owners or managers compare your commercial residential property insurance coverage vs. the competition....

Determining Vacant Property Perils and Valuations

Are your clients fully covered for Vacant Properties? In this economic climate, your insureds may...

Risk Management for Law Firms

This package of 3 concise risk management articles offers straightforward content and practical suggestions law...

Guide: Top 15 E&O Risks-And How To Avoid Them

Accidents happen. But when it's an errors and omissions oversight, that accident can open your...

We'll Show You How to Reach Your Sales Goals

Whether you work alone or have a team of agents working for you, we can...

Forensic Insider eNewsletter

Get investigative information and forensic insight to help you reach optimal claims outcomes – FREE. Sign Up Now!

Claims-Handling Guidelines

Claims Magazine is providing the following free guidelines and regulations in order to help adjusting professionals stay abreast of each state’s unique property and casualty claim-handling requirements.

View our State Guidelines »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.